Overview
This guide explains how clubs should assess and mark referees following a match.
Referee marks must:
-
reflect the overall performance of the referee;
-
be awarded fairly and objectively;
-
not be influenced by isolated incidents or match results.
1. Referee Marking Scale
| Mark Range | Description |
|---|
| 100 – 86 | Very accurate decision-making. Controlled the game very well using strong management and communication to add value to the game. |
| 85 – 76 | Accurate decision-making. Controlled the game well and contributed positively through good management and communication. |
| 75 – 61 | Reasonably accurate decision-making. Some shortcomings, but generally controlled the game well. |
| 60 and below | Noticeable shortcomings in decision-making and control which negatively affected the game. |
2. Key Principles of Marking
2.1 Use the Full Range
-
Use the full mark range within each band
-
Example: A mark of 84 reflects a stronger performance than 77
2.2 Avoid Extremely Low Marks
-
Very low marks should be rare
-
Most performances will include at least some positive aspects
2.3 Assess the Whole Game
-
Focus on the overall performance
Do not base marks on:
-
a single decision; or
-
one incident
2.4 Do Not Be Influenced by Results
-
The match outcome must not influence the mark
-
Disciplinary decisions should be judged objectively
3.1 When Required
If a mark of 60 or below is given:
-
An explanation must be provided via the marking form
3.2 Purpose of Feedback
Comments should:
-
help the referee improve;
-
be constructive and specific;
-
focus on performance, not criticism
4. How to Decide on a Referee’s Mark
4.1 General Approach
The following questions act as an aide memoire to support your assessment.
They are:
-
not exhaustive; and
-
do not need to be answered individually
However, they should be considered before assigning a mark.
5. Control and Decision-Making
5.1 Game Control
-
How well did the referee control the game?
-
Were incidents handled efficiently and effectively?
5.2 Decision Accuracy
-
Were players’ actions recognised correctly?
-
Were the Laws of the Game applied correctly?
-
Were appropriate sanctions applied consistently?
5.3 Positioning and Awareness
-
Was the referee well positioned for key decisions (especially penalty area)?
-
Did they stay within reasonable distance of play?
-
Did they show alertness and concentration throughout?
5.4 Game Understanding
-
Did the referee understand player movement and positioning?
-
Did they stay out of the way of play where appropriate?
-
Did they apply advantage effectively based on the flow of the game?
-
Were they aware of player attitudes to advantage?
5.5 Teamwork
-
Did the referee use assistant referees effectively?
-
Did the officials work well as a team?
-
Did the referee lead and manage the officiating team effectively?
6. Communication and Player Management
6.1 Communication
-
How effectively did the referee communicate with players?
-
Did their level of involvement suit the game?
6.2 Game Management
6.3 Authority and Control
-
Was authority applied firmly but appropriately?
-
Did the referee remain confident and composed?
-
Did they appear calm when making key decisions?
6.4 Player Behaviour Management
6.5 Body Language and Pressure Handling
-
Was body language confident and open?
-
Did external pressure (crowd, players, pace of game) affect performance?
7. Final Considerations
7.1 Be Objective
-
Avoid marking immediately after the game if emotions are high
-
Take time to reflect before submitting a mark
7.2 Judge the Whole Match
-
Consider the full match performance
-
Do not overemphasise a single moment
7.3 Remain Fair
Quick Reference Summary
What to Consider
-
Decision-making accuracy
-
Game control
-
Communication
-
Player management
-
Positioning and teamwork
Key Rules
-
Mark the overall performance
-
Use the full mark range
-
Be objective and fair
-
Provide comments for 60 or below